Move along, nothing to read

For a class on Online Marketing, I had to dig up and review to articles on some elements of online marketing that interested me. I've purposefully decided to post one of my reviews here, as the article was very interesting (showing how spam can be profitable)

Bibliography - The Value of a Name - Arthur Middleton Hughes

(I'd like to add an alternative title: "Why spam is profitable." On a flight of fancy, I decided to seek out articles that provided a profitability comparison between direct mailings in the physical world, and digital direct mailings (email, possibly spam). I found this article to be an excellent discussion).

Hughes (2002) presents an analysis of direct mailing as compared to emailing, for the purpose of increasing revenues, both directly and indirectly. Hughes initially presents the problems behind existing data mining (including privacy, as relative value of information). Hughes then brings in an anecdote that spurred this paper into existence, and uses it provide an initial example on the value of data mining, as well as a simple calculation of the value of some mined data.

For the bulk of the paper, Hughes dives deeply into the calculations to find the value of some aggregate data, but then does well by tying it back together in an intelligible fashion. Hughes has a brief diversion to note that the value of the data may be significantly higher when market segmentation is brought into play, but does not expand further on this. Hughes' math continues for an analysis the value behind an improved retention rate, as well as specific marketing that is enabled by email (low cost products and last minute specials).

Hughes also gives special concern to the value of specific retention and followup communication, to help keep a customer. Hughes then also ties in the value of viral marketing with email (potential for a very high response rate), as well as newsletters. Hughes also covers a somewhat dark field of emailing marketing, namely renting out email lists. This is treading into the territory of spam, and provides a quick view of why spam is so profitable. (Hughes entirely avoids the mention that renting out lists can be a shady and possibly unethical business.)

Finally, Hughes ties up the article by noting that most companies can benefit from at least half of the practices he described to gain at least $15 of value out of every email address that the company has. Additionally, Hughes points out that it seems no company has worked out the value of emailing marketing with any degree of precision, and that further email address collection will positively impact any company.

References

Hughes, A.M. (2002). The value of a name. Journal of Database Marketing; December 2002, Vol. 10 Issue 2, p159, 16p

If addiction is judged by how long a dumb animal will sit pressing a lever to get a "fix" of something, to its own detriment, then I would conclude that netnews is far more addictive than cocaine.

-- Rob Stampfli

http://www.media.mit.edu.nyud.net:8090/press/clocky/index.html

When the alarm clock goes off and the snooze button is pressed, Clocky will roll off the bedside table and wheel away, bumping mindlessly into objects on the floor until it eventually finds a spot to rest. Minutes later, when the alarm sounds again, the sleeper must get up out of bed and search for Clocky. This ensures that the person is fully awake before turning it off. Small wheels that are concealed by Clocky's shag enable it to move and reposition itself, and an internal processor helps it find a new hiding spot every day.

Welcome to the most deceptive TechWeek ever.

It looks like a light load, but there is actually a LOT of work hidden in some of these items, as well as the ongoing INTD404 project, that I still need to get more development done on.

Additionally:
14 March, 19h00-23h30 - Marissa's birthday party
15 March, 20h00-23h00 - Opera (Cosí fan tutte)
I might only attend one part of Marissa's party, depends how I'm doing with Techweek.

   1046 N * Mar 11 Andrew Esparza  (  22) Internet P/harmacy
   1047 N * Mar 05 Young E. Hahn   (  22) Internet P\harmacy
   1048 N * Mar 02 Lisa Kirkpatric (  22) Internet Ph!armacy
   1049 N * Mar 03 Rodger Keller   (  22) Internet Ph%armacy
   1050 N * Mar 01 Jami Hatfield   (  22) Internet Ph@armacy
   1051 N * Mar 08 Cristina Eubank (  22) Internet Ph]armacy
   1052 N * Mar 10 Arnulfo Cruz    (  22) Internet Pha(rmacy
   1053 N * Mar 11 Lula R. Chang   (  22) Internet Pha*rmacy
   1054 N * Mar 09 Clark Swan      (  22) Internet Pha/rmacy
   1055 N * Mar 07 Glen Woodruff   (  22) Internet Pha\rmacy
   1056 N * Mar 02 Hillary Abraham (  22) Internet Phar/macy
   1057 N * Mar 05 Freddy K. Stubb (  22) Internet Phar\macy
   1058 N * Mar 02 Charley Meeks   (  22) Internet Pharm(acy
   1059 N * Mar 06 Annmarie Kruege (  22) Internet Pharm*acy
   1060 N * Mar 10 Hollis Brown    (  22) Internet Pharm^acy
   1061 N * Mar 02 Sandra Barnard  (  22) Internet Pharma!cy
   1062 N * Mar 07 Johnathan W. Ba (  22) Internet Pharma*cy
   1063 N * Feb 28 Fay Kay         (  22) Internet Pharma/cy
   1064 N * Mar 01 Beverley Gibbs  (  22) Internet Pharma/cy
   1065 N * Mar 05 Deandre Carson  (  22) Internet Pharma@cy
   1066 N * Mar 08 Dexter Tatum    (  22) Internet Pharma@cy
   1067 N * Mar 03 Georgette Suthe (  22) Internet Pharma]cy
   1068 N * Mar 04 Bertha Oneil    (  22) Internet Pharmac(y
   1069 N * Feb 28 Don Neely       (  22) Internet Pharmac*y
   1070 N * Mar 07 Art Sewell      (  22) Internet Pharmac/y
   1071 N * Mar 06 Brian Ellison   (  22) Internet Pharmac[y