robbat2: (Default)
[personal profile] robbat2

Recently I've been digging around in the annuls of Gentoo history, working on what will hopefully be the final tree-signing proposal before it actually becomes a full reality. During the midst of this, Stuart came up to me in #gentoo-dev:

<Stuart> robbat2: btw, did you see this week's LWN?
<Stuart> robbat2: the one of using Google Code to find PHP apps that are vulnerable to allow_url_fopen attacks
<Stuart> robbat2: you were right, all those years ago. just wanted to tell you that.

I wasn't the first to come up with the idea, the BSD ports folk were talking about it around the same time we were in mid-July 2003, and I was aware of their discussion, but I believe that Gentoo was the first Linux distribution to make this jump in turning it off. I took a lot of flak at the time for breaking many PHP applications in the name of security, but history has now shown that allow_url_fopen is a very common PHP exploit, and with the advent of Google Code, many sites may now considerably more vulnerable - and all of this could have been mostly avoided a long time ago if PHP had just included a taint mode from the start...

I hadn't read LWN yet, it's only been out a few hours, yet here the article is: "Remote file inclusion vulnerabilities". Stuart also posted a link back into the murky depths of the Gentoo CVS, with a commit I made in July 2003, that turned off allow_url_fopen by default in Gentoo.

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

May 2017

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
141516171819 20
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags