Entry tags:
RAW processing of digital camera images
I've been looking at the photos from my wedding - I specifically ask the photographer if I could get a copy of all of the RAW images (and I gave him plenty of DVD-Rs to put them on).
I'd heard there was some difference in processing results, but I'm surprised to see that Linux seems to be huge leaps ahead of Windows in terms of results.
Here's a small sample I put together:
http://tinyurl.com/fkmw2
- One from the wedding photographer (He used either Adobe Photoshop CS2, or the Canon utility)
- UFRAW
- DCRAW (configuration #1)
- DCRAW (configuration #2)
All image were saved/resaved with jpeg-75 compression, so that the files wouldn't be too large for online comparison.
I would suggest that you download all of them, and then compare them side-by-side, piecewise.
Thereafter, could you please vote here (if you don't have a livejournal account, please leave a comment with your vote instead)?
[Poll #814130]
Results of which file was processed by what tool will be revealed in a few days.
I'd heard there was some difference in processing results, but I'm surprised to see that Linux seems to be huge leaps ahead of Windows in terms of results.
Here's a small sample I put together:
http://tinyurl.com/fkmw2
- One from the wedding photographer (He used either Adobe Photoshop CS2, or the Canon utility)
- UFRAW
- DCRAW (configuration #1)
- DCRAW (configuration #2)
All image were saved/resaved with jpeg-75 compression, so that the files wouldn't be too large for online comparison.
I would suggest that you download all of them, and then compare them side-by-side, piecewise.
Thereafter, could you please vote here (if you don't have a livejournal account, please leave a comment with your vote instead)?
[Poll #814130]
Results of which file was processed by what tool will be revealed in a few days.
Bad answer
darker gold of d looks better than ...
The monitor says...
(Anonymous) 2006-09-05 05:06 am (UTC)(link)B: Overall, the image seems a little dark and muted. The colours seem a tad washed out.
C: Contrast is great. Colours are a little dull -- the Babelfish seems greener than it ought to be. Overall, feels like it's illuminated by fluorescent lighting. This may be accurate, but not so pleasing.
D: The colours seem to be very warm, the contrast is decent, and the babelfish is reasonably yellow.
Overall, image D wins out for me, closely followed by C. B follows further behind, with A being summarily disqualified.
Hard choices
no subject
vote
(Anonymous) 2006-09-05 01:27 pm (UTC)(link)B over D because of the aforementioned napkin. C seemed unnaturally white compared to the others.